How to Write a Persuasive Essay For Your High School Class

How to Write a Persuasive Essay For Your High School ClassIn order to write a great persuasive essay, it is essential that you write a sample persuasive essay for your High School English Course. The reason for this is that it is the best way to show your teacher that you can get your point across in a logical and coherent manner.You see, many students who are trying to get their writing homework done do not put any effort into writing because they are too busy trying to fit in as many papers as possible. However, this does not mean that you cannot do well in your papers. The important thing to remember is that you should work on writing to improve your own writing skills as well as those of your teacher.So what should you write in your High School English Course if you need to write a sample persuasive essay for your The Grade? This is not an easy question to answer because each class has different requirements. However, the key here is to put in the time and effort required to prop erly research the topics, and then write about them.When you start your research, you should first take a look at the topic of the class and then find out the popular topics of the day so that you can apply them. With this information, you will be able to have an idea of what your topic should be. For example, if your class is teaching about animals and nature, you will need to write about four main areas such as vegetarianism, preservation of wildlife, exposure to different cultures, and way of life of people.The next step when writing a sample persuasive essay for your The Grade is to make sure that your topic is both interesting and relevant. Too many times students will not get this part right, but they often forget about this later on because they are too preoccupied with writing their papers. It is also important that you realize that the essay is for your class, not your professor.After you have researched your topic, you will be able to write your persuasive essay for your T he Grade. One tip that will help you get your paper done quicker is to break it up into chapters, or to divide it into paragraphs. This way, you will be able to make sure that you are making use of your allotted time.Another way to write a persuasive essay for your The Grade is to summarize your points in a chapter. As a rule of thumb, you will want to summarize anything that you are going to talk about in about 50 words. Although you should not completely write down everything that you will talk about, you should not completely miss any details either.Finally, when writing a persuasive essay for your The Grade, you will want to make sure that you carefully read the rest of the paper. If you are unable to follow what is written, you may want to edit your essay before the paper is turned in.

Tyranny Essays - Forms Of Government, Ancient Greek Philosophers

Tyranny Within The Republic, Plato states that tyranny is "the most diseased" kind of society (Republic, 544c). Aristotle echoes this belief when he boldly asserts within Politics that great honours should be "bestowed... on him who kills a tyrant." (Politics, 1267a15) From these quotes alone, it is clear that both share a disdain for tyranny. This essay will compare and contrast Plato (the Republic) with Aristotle (the Politics) on the causes and consequences of tyranny. In order to grasp how Plato accounts for the development of tyranny, it is important to understand how he equates the city with the soul. Within The Republic, Plato explains that the soul consists of three parts: reason (wisdom), spirit (courage/honour) and appetite (moderation/desire). The class structure of Plato's ideal city also embodies these divisions: The guardians or"philosopher kings" represent wisdom and are entrusted to rule; the auxiliaries represent courage and serve to protect the city; the producers represent moderation and serve to provide the economic and agricultural base for the city. While, as Plato connotes in this analogy, all three parts have a place in constructing the ideal, reason is the guiding force that mediates and draws from the competing nature of these parts to produce a just city. Accordingly, since "change in every regime comes from that part of it which holds the ruling offices," (Republic, 551d) it is the loss of reason by the ruling class which destroys the just city and provides for the eventual onset of tyranny, a state devoid of harmony amongst its parts. In explaining how the ideal city would eventually degenerate, Plato puts forth a four-stage linear digression towards tyranny. From the ideal state, a timocracy is first born from the love of honour. As wealth becomes cherished among the citizens, timocracy gives way to oligarchy. In an oligarchic state, the desire for freedom or license leads to the rise of democracy. And finally, as the desire for freedom increases and becomes limitless, the city is said to fall into a state of tyranny. Thus, for Plato, a tyrant is a democrat who has lost all restraint. While Plato views the decay towards tyranny as a uniform digression, the presence of this widespread decay ultimately creates the conditions for one person to rise to power. (Republic, 565d) Within this digression, reason is gradually overcome by appetite until an "insatiable desire" for freedom transforms a democracy into a tyranny. While such terms as "freedom" and "democracy" may elicit certain connotations for the contemporary reader, it is important to keep in mind that Plato views a regime that promotes freedom and license as its primary objective as a place where reason is overcome by desire. While citizens of such regimes might equate unrestricted democracy with freedom, as Plato explains, "the real tyrant is, even if he doesn't seem so...in truth a real slave." (Republic, 579d) In practical terms, Plato views money and private property as the floodgate to this decay: Whenever they'll possess private land, houses, and currency, they'll become... masters and enemies instead of allies of the other citizens; hating and being hated, plotting and being plotted against, they'll lead their lives far more afraid of the enemies within than those without. Then they themselves as well as the rest of the city are already rushing towards a destruction that lies very near. (Republic, 417a) Since in the ideal city or soul, a proper balance of its parts produces justice, tyranny, in Plato's view, is the complete absence of justice resulting from an emphasis on the search for private property and self-gratification. While Aristotle acknowledges that a philosopher king, as presented by Plato, should be allowed to rule, he is skeptical that such a figure could exist. He is critical of The Republic as he does not see Plato's tripartite construction as a probable or even desirable structure. Choosing a more pragmatic lens, Aristotle approaches politics by drawing upon the existent structures of government, namely monarchy as the rule by one person, aristocracy as the rule by the few and constitutional government as the rule by the many. Outlining their negative counterparts, Aristotle refers to the rule by the many as a democracy, by the few as an oligarchy, and by the one as a tyranny. "For tyranny is a kind of monarchy which has in view the interest of the monarch only." (Politics, 1279b) While this list may resemble that of Plato's, Aristotle refutes the linear digression into tyranny put forth within The Republic. (Politics, 1303a15-30) Although Aristotle advocates a mixed regime or "polity" as the best possible political